(2018) 1 Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr. 101–105
https://doi.org/10.34285/visnyknapu2018.53.101
Title of the article	Scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Basic Positions of ECHR
Author(s)	DMYTRO LOTIUK chief research officer of department of research on problems of the European Court of Human Rights case-law implementation into prosecutorial activity, Scientific Research Institute, National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine, dima6402i@gmail.com
Short title of the journal (ISSN)	Visn. Nac. akad. prokur. Ukr.
Year	2018
Issue	1
Pages	[101–105]
Language	Ukrainian
Abstract	This article explores the scope of the European Court of Human Rights article 8 of the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. The positive obligations of the state are described and the terms of the legality of restricting individual rights under this article.
Keywords	private life; family life; home; correspondence European Court of Human Rights.
References	REFERENCES 1. Ofitsiinyi Veb-sait Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny [Official Website of the European Court of Human Rights] URL: (in Ukrainian). 2. Tyrer v. the United Kingdom App no 26 (ECtHR, 25 April 1978). URL: (in Ukrainian). 3. Pritti v. The United Kingdom App no 44647/98 (ECtHR, 29 April 2002). URL: (in Ukrainian). 4. Gaskin v. United Kingdom App no 159 (ECtHR, 7 July 1989). URL: (in Ukrainian). 5. Lopez Ostra v. Spain App no 16798/90 (ECtHR, 9 December 1994). URL: (in Ukrainian). 6. Z v. Finland App no 1997-I (ECtHR, 25 February 1997). URL: (in Ukrainian). 7. Glass v. United Kingdom App no 61827/00 (ECtHR, 9 March 2004). URL: (in Ukrainian). 8. Guillot V. France App no 22500/93 (ECtHR, 23 September 1996). URL: (in Ukrainian). 9. Bulgakov v. Ukraine App no59894/00 (ECtHR, 11 September 2007). URL: (in Ukrainian). 10. Garnaga v. Ukraine App no 20390/07 (ECtHR, 16 May 2013). URL: (in Ukrainian). 11. Smirnova v. Russia App no 46133/99 & 48183/99 (ECtHR, 24 July 2003). URL: (in Ukrainian). 12. Niemietz v. Germany App no 251-В (ECtHR, 16 December 1992). URL: (in Ukrainian). 13. Реск v. United Kingdom App no 44647/98 (ECtHR, 28 January 2003). URL: (in Ukrainian). 14. Rotaru v. Romania App no 28341/95 (ECtHR, 4 May 2000). URL: (in Ukrainian). 15. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom App no 45 (ECtHR, 23 September 1981). URL: (in Ukrainian). 16. Keegan v. Ireland App no 290 (ECtHR, 26 May 1994). URL: (in Ukrainian). 17. Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands App no 297-C (ECtHR, 27 October 1994). URL: (in Ukrainian). 18. Boyle v. United Kingdom App no 16580/90 (ECtHR, 9 February 1993). URL: (in Ukrainian). 19. Buckley v. the United Kingdom App no 1996-IV (ECtHR, 25 September 1996). URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show (in Ukrainian). 20. Moreno Gomez v. Spain App no 4143/02 (ECtHR, 16 February 2005). URL: (in Ukrainian). 21. Akhtyrska N., Filatov V., Fulei T., Khembakh Kh. Stattia 8 Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod: standarty zastosuvannia pry zdiisnenni pravosuddia [The Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Standards of Application in the Administration of Justice]. Kyiv: Istyna, 2011. 200 p. (in Ukrainian). 22. Michaud v. France App no 12323/11 (ECtHR, 6 December 2012). URL: (in Ukrainian). 23. Golder v. United Kingdom App no 4451/70 (ECtHR, 21 February 1975). URL: (in Ukrainian). 24. Klass and Others v. Germany App no 5029/71 (ECtHR, 6 September 1978). URL: (in Ukrainian). 25. Malone v. United Kihgdom App no 8691/79 (ECtHR, 2 August 1984). URL: (in Ukrainian). 26. Copland v. United Kingdom App no 62617/00 (ECtHR, 3 April 2001). URL: (in Ukrainian). 27. Rees v. United Kingdom App no 9532/81 (ECtHR, 17 October 1986). URL: (in Ukrainian). 28. X. and Y. Netherlands App no 8978/80 (ECtHR, 26 March 1985). URL: (in Ukrainian). 29. Kruslin v. France App no 176-А (ECtHR, 24 April 1990). URL: (in Ukrainian). 30. Campbell v. United Kingdom App no 13590/88 (ECtHR, 25 March 1992). URL: (in Ukrainian).